Size: 3# 4# 5# 8# 10#
Material: Nylon Teeth, Polyester or Cotton Tape
Color: Pantone, YCC, GCC, YKK
Slider: Reverse Auto Locking Slider
End Type: Close End or Open End
Feature: Hidden Teeth, with logo printed
We also have a special Transparent Zippers.
Transparent Zippers are one of the most Special Zipper branch, because it use PVC material as the Zipper tape that is big different from any other normal Zippers use polyester or cotton fabric. Zippers For Bags contained many different tape material: PVC, PP, PE, ABS, EVA and so on. And usually the color of Zipper For Bag is clear transparent, can also be change into other translucent or transparent color to suit customer's need. With features of good plasticity, low-priced and waterproof, PVC Zipper are widely used in garment, package, decoration and industry production.
Classification:
Just ask for your customisation and we can make it for you!
Zipper Custom,Custom Zippers,Zipper For Bags,Zipper For Bag,Zippers For Bags Shenzhen Yiyixing Zipper Manufacture Co.,Ltd , https://www.nicekeychain.com
From October to December 2004, The Industrial Group Suning Huasuqi Leather Products Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Theses Company) found that Wuxi Mengyan Garment Co., Ltd. sold by Shijiazhuang Oriental City Plaza Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Dongsheng Company) Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Dream Yan Company) designed two fur jackets and Watson's design in September 2003 two fur jacket art and design graphics generally similar, the company believes that the costume design and practical works of art copyright Law protection, Meng Yan company infringed the copyright of its company, then Meng Yan company and the East purchased the company to the Intermediate People's Court of Shijiazhuang City, seeking compensation for its economic losses of 47 million yuan.
The court of first instance held that the costume design drawings and the works of practical art were protected by the copyright law. However, the sample clothes or clothing articles designed and produced by the company in this case are not protected by the copyright law. Moreover, it is considered that the general design drawings of the company's clothing are only protected as general works, and garments formed according to the design drawings and the instructions thereof are not protected by the copyright law and should belong to the industrial property law adjustment Category. Therefore dismissed the company claims. The company refused to accept the case and filed an appeal to the High Court of Hebei Province, asking the court to revoke the judgment of the first instance and support its claim.
Second instance, the company believes that, according to the design drawings for construction (the plane will be transformed into three-dimensional) should be protected by copyright law; clothing as a practical artwork is protected by the copyright law, but also by the patent law; Counterfeit the style of its corporate clothing is the copy of the company's three-dimensional works.
Dream Yan company argues that the review from the perspective of fine arts, the company's renderings and the company is completely different from the company, the two companies designed by the company even though the use of fur fabric, but the style is still on the market jacket Style, does not have originality, does not constitute a practical artwork, should not be protected by copyright law.
The court of second instance held that the works protected by the copyright law of our country are intellectual achievements that are original in the fields of literature, art and science and can be reproduced in some tangible form. Therefore, the company advocated the arts and crafts design clothing and apparel garments only comply with copyright law provisions of the work in order to enjoy the corresponding copyright. Product originality should be understood as long as the designer of the product design is not plagiarism alone, that is, the composition of the product design drawings, not whether the aesthetic significance of the constituent elements. The company's fashion design process is the company's designers independent design, therefore, the design of the two costumes can be used as a product design drawings by our copyright law protection.
At the same time, the court held that practical artwork should be an intellectual creation that is practical, artistic, and in line with the composition of the work, so that it can be protected by our copyright law. Clothing as a practical artwork to be protected by our copyright law must also meet these conditions. Only those who have practical but more artistic appreciation of clothing can be protected as a practical artwork. The two garments designed by the company from the artistry required by the practical artwork only use the common elements in the fashion design to make the combination and do not constitute the artistic expression originally created by the company. As a practical art by our copyright law, so the case from the clothing design to the clothing of the act does not constitute a copy of the copyright law, Dream Yan company and the company's costume design similar clothing, does not constitute a The copyright infringement of the product design.
As for the issue that Theus Company listed the East Purchasing Company as the co-infringer, the court held that at the first instance, the East Purchasing Company provided the relevant evidence that its rental counter was operated by Meng Yan Company independently, so the East Purchasing Company did not infringe, so the dismissal Appeal, uphold the original verdict.
Comments: original works of art are not subject to copyright protection
In this case, the company chose to infringe on the copyright of "utility artwork" to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the company's two fur garments.
As for the concept of "practical artwork", there is no stipulation in our country's copyright law. The concept that is more accepted by most people is the interpretation of the "law of copyright and neighboring rights" compiled by the World Intellectual Property Organization. That is, "practical artwork refers to the Practical works of art, whether the work is handicrafts or industrial products. " Art has the aesthetic significance or appreciation, and practical works of art in addition to artistic, but also has practical value, with its practical functions for people to use directly.
According to our copyright law and its implementing regulations, art works include works of art. However, there are different views on whether art works include practical works of art, academia and judicial practice.
In general, practical works of art can be divided into two situations: practical works of art that can be separated from practical ones can have practical value after removing their artistic components; and the other is that practical and non-separable artistic compositions Practical artwork, the art component directly to the practical components as a carrier, if the removal of its artistic composition, it means that the utility of the loss of its practical functions.
It has become a common practice in judicial practice to impose copyright protection on practical works of art which can be separated from practical compositions and art components and to separate the artistic compositions separated from the practical works of art as works of art. The approval of the State Copyright Administration This is also clearly affirmed.
For the practical artwork whose practical composition and artistic composition can not be separated, whether the court provides the copyright protection in the judicial trial practice, although there are two kinds of views that can be protected and can not be protected, according to the legislative intention of the copyright law, the protection of the artwork Is to protect its original art expression form. Then for such practical works of art, excluding the practical functional parts (such as clothing collar, sleeves and other basic structure), and then exclude the existence of such products exist in the public domain or already exist Elements (such as apparel in the development process of the accumulation of some collars, sleeves and other parts of the style), the rest should be creators original artistic expression, copyright protection should be given.
In summary, regardless of the type of utility artwork, the part of artistic expression that the creator created must be protected. In the present case, two costume styles of the company contain the original creative concept and concept of the designer. However, in terms of the expression form, after deducting the expression elements suitable for the beauty of the costume in the public domain, Formed designer original artistic expression. It is based on this, the court ruled dismissed the company's claims.
Custom Zipper
In today's word, more and more peope woul lie to add their own logo or text desgn on the produt. So as the ipper ndusty, many customer's requestsome appers with their own logo to show ther brand characteristc. Custom apper often made of four knds apper incude nyon ipper ny/on reverse zppe,refective zpper and waterproof ipper. Of course, sometimes one of the zipper can eamed ll of other three zippers' features. The lbgo prntng can beLase, Sublimated, Silk Screen Prnting and Jacquard to folow customer's design.The logo can also be design by us if customer aleady pace order.
Specification:
1. PVC Flat Zipper: The Zipper For Bags teeth top and bottom open or close with a metal or plastic puller
2. PVC Clip zipper: The PVC zipper teeth two side open or close with a clip puller
3. PVC Nylon Zipper: The PVC zipper tape sewed with nylon teeth
4. PVC Ziplock Zipper: Non Zipper Slider, and can be lock by itself.
Similar similarities caused by the "copyright" dispute
Variety of styles of clothing not only meet the aesthetic needs of different people, but also add color to the world. However, some clothing design similar but easily lead to unnecessary legal disputes. Recently, the provincial high court concluded a such case ---